SRINIVASA
INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
(UGC - AUTONOMOUS)
Approved by AICTE, Permanently Affiliated to JNTUK, Accredited by NAAC with 'A' grade
+91 7569171667, 9391193035
CET CODE: SRIN
+91 7569171667, 9391193035
The examinations committee frames guidelines and policies to conduct, monitor, review, control the examinations. The cell works on improvement of the systems of examination, appoint the paper setters, examiners, moderators, finalization of condonation/ detained/ promoted/ re-registration/ re-admission and to prepare the schedules of examinations, malpractice/grievance issues of students/ staff, evaluation, scrutiny, moderation, tabulation, declaration of the results, revaluation/challenge evaluation, issue of various certificates and arrange for graduation ceremony.
Composition:
|
S.No |
Name |
Designation |
Role |
|
1 |
Dr. Ch V S Parameswara Rao |
Principal |
Chairman |
|
2 |
Dr S.Jaya Lakshmi |
Dean (Academics) |
Member |
|
3 |
Dr B.Ratna Raju |
Dean -IQAC |
Member |
|
4 |
Dr KV Subrahmayan |
Prof.-CSE&ACE |
Member |
|
5 |
Mr G.Akhil Gupta |
Asst.Pro.&ACE |
Member |
|
6 |
Dr Bala Krishna |
University Nominee |
Member |
|
7 |
Dr R J Mathews |
Controller of Examinations |
Member Secretary |
Frequency of Meeting:
The committee shall meet atleast twice in each academic term or as and when required. The member secretary in consultation with the chairman prepares and circulates the agenda of the meeting well in advance. The member secretary maintains the minutes of the meeting and action taken report.
The role and responsibilities are to
1. Ensure paper setting, moderation, conduct of examination, evaluation, results processing, declaration of results and all examination related works.
2. Conduct examinations smoothly under strict vigilance by timely execution of examination schedules.
3. Ensure suitable punishment based on the recommendations of the malpractice prevention committee for students.
4. Initiate appropriate punishment on violation of rules during the examination process to staff, paper setters, examiners, moderators, valuers, scrutinizers, referees or any other persons.
5. Hold periodical meetings in a semester or on emergencies to initiate necessary action.
6. Recommend examination process reforms from time to time in question paper settings, scheme of evaluation, digital valuation, expedite the results and issue of certificates.
7. Conduct post-audit at random for evaluation procedures.
8. Maintain compliance with moderation/grafting/grace-marks/publish the results in website/ notification of revaluation/challenge valuation.
9. Declare the final results after revaluation/challenge valuation and distribution of relevant certificates.
